Home Health Medication Therapy Management Shows Limited Results

Low-risk Medicare patients entering home health care who received medication therapy management by phone were three times less likely to be hospitalized within the next two months, while those at greater risk saw no benefit, according to a study led by Purdue University.

The study helped determine which patients benefit most from medication therapy management by phone and a way to identify them through a standardized risk score, said Alan Zillich, associate professor of pharmacy practice at Purdue, who led the research.

“Hopefully, this study will help home health care providers target the intervention to those who it will help and improve patient health,” he said. “It also tells us there are some patients for whom medication therapy management by phone doesn’t work and that we need a different strategy to help these patients.”

In medication therapy management a pharmacist evaluates the medications prescribed and how a patient is feeling to identify and resolve issues, including untreated conditions, drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate drugs or doses and whether a patient is taking the medications as prescribed.

“We know that medication therapy management (MTM) improves adherence, improves outcomes and improves lives,” said Patrick Dunham, CEO of Curant Health, which provided the medication therapy management interventions. “Reducing hospital admissions for the lowest-risk patients in this study by 86 percent is another powerful proof point for the value of MTM and its capability to simultaneously reduce costs and improve care across the health care continuum.”

As Medicare may add incentives or penalties for home health care providers based on hospitalization rates, studies of medication management models could influence policy, Zillich said.

“Enhancing the quality of care for patients has always been the goal of health care providers, but the growing costs of Medicare and health care in general have put an even brighter spotlight on strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs,” he said. “Medication therapy management is considered a valuable tool in this effort, but the best way to deliver it and the patients whom it will most benefit have not been well studied.”

Zillich led a team of researchers who collaborated with the home health care organization Amedisys Inc., and pharmacists from Curant Health (formerly HealthStat Rx), who provided the medication therapy management intervention. A paper detailing the research was published in the journal Health Services Research and is available online. Amedisys Inc. funded the research.

“Just as we hypothesized, post-acute care interventions can make a positive impact on preventing issues the elderly may have with their complicated medication regimes: ultimately resulting in lower admissions,” said Dr. Michael Fleming, chief medical officer for Amedisys.

The study followed 895 patients from 40 Amedisys home health care centers throughout the United States, with 415 receiving the intervention.

The intervention consisted of an initial phone call by a pharmacy technician to verify active medications, a pharmacist-provided medication regimen review and follow-up phone calls from a pharmacist one week later and as needed for 30 days.

The most common types of medication-related errors are identified soon after transitions of care take place and the first days are the most critical, Zillich said.

“Time is of the essence,” he said. “The transition to home-based care – as with any type of transitions in care – is a vulnerable time for patients. It involves a switch in health care providers and sometimes a delay in the handoff of medical records. The patients likely have had significant changes or additions to their medications, and sometimes medication-related problems are just starting to appear.”

The results showed no overall significant difference in the 60-day probability of hospitalization for those who received medication management therapy by phone versus those who did not. However, when the patients were evaluated based on their risk profiles, those in the lowest-risk group who received the service were three times more likely to remain out of the hospital 60 days after entering into home health care.

A patient’s risk of hospitalization was determined through a standard set of nursing assessment items used by all Medicare-certified home health agencies called the “Outcome and Assessment Information Set” or OASIS-C, and the patients were divided into four risk categories.

“Most elderly patients requiring home health care are dealing with multiple chronic conditions and taking multiple medications,” Zillich said. “When we say “low-risk” patients in this context, we are talking about the least sick of a very sick group of patients. I’m not sure why they benefited so much from this intervention while the other groups did not. One theory is that they are better able to receive and retain guidance from a pharmacist over the phone and perhaps face-to-face medication therapy management would better help the higher-risk patients.”

The team plans to further explore intervention models that would be more effective for the higher-risk Medicare patients entering into home health care.

New Information about Quality of Care in Nursing Homes

nursing-home-quality-careResearch findings on Quality of Care are discussed in a new report. According to news reporting originating from Chapel Hill, North Carolina, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, “Purpose of the Study: Culture change models are intended to improve the quality of life for nursing home residents, but the impact of these models on quality of care is unknown. We evaluated the impact of the implementation of nursing home culture change on the quality of care, as measured by staffing, health-related survey deficiencies, and Minimum Data Set (MDS) quality indicators.”

Our news editors obtained a quote from the research from the University of North Carolina, “From the Pioneer Network, we have data on whether facilities were identified by experts as culture change providers in 2004 and 2009. Using administrative data, we employed a panel-based regression approach in which we compared prepost quality outcomes in facilities adopting culture change between 2004 and 2009 against prepost quality outcomes for a propensity score-matched comparison group of nonadopters. Nursing homes that were identified as culture change adopters exhibited a 14.6% decrease in health-related survey deficiency citations relative to comparable nonadopting homes, while experiencing no significant change in nurse staffing or various MDS quality indicators. This research represents the first large-scale longitudinal evaluation of the association of culture change and nursing home quality of care. Based on the survey deficiency results, nursing homes that were identified as culture change adopters were associated with better care although the surveyors were not blind to the nursing homes culture change efforts.”

According to the news editors, the research concluded: “This finding suggests culture change may have the potential to improve MDS-based quality outcomes, but this has not yet been observed.”

For more information on this research see: Culture Change and Nursing Home Quality of Care. Gerontologist, 2014;54():S35-S45. Gerontologist can be contacted at: Oxford Univ Press Inc, Journals Dept, 2001 Evans Rd, Cary, NC 27513, USA. (Oxford University Press – www.oup.com/; Gerontologist – gerontologist.oxfordjournals.org)

The news editors report that additional information may be obtained by contacting D.C. Grabowski, University of North Carolina, Sch Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC 27515, United States. Additional authors for this research include A.J. O’Malley, C.C. Afendulis, D.J. Caudry, A. Elliot and S. Zimmerman.